Jungian Analysis: The Four Major Groups of Personality Patterns

Carl G. Jung, who was a well reputed Swiss psychiatrist and psychotherapist, theorized about “psychological types,” which are people characterized according to their (1) preference of general attitude (extroverted vs. introverted), (2) functions of perception (sensing vs. intuition), and (3) functions of judging (thinking vs. feeling). Isabel Briggs Myers, a practitioner of Jung’s theory, proposed a fourth pattern: judging vs. perceiving. All these are part of the Jungian analysis, which is a psychological model that involves dichotomies or bipolar dimensions of a certain attitude.

Extroversion vs. Introversion. This personality pattern identifies the source and direction of an individual’s energy expression. An extrovert expresses his or her energy in the external world while an introvert does it in his or her own internal world.

Image source: hrmonline.ca


Sensing vs. Intuition. This dictates the way a person perceives information. Sensing draws conclusion from the five senses and direct experiences. Intuition, meanwhile, processes data more imaginatively, even anchoring it on trust, the subconscious, the “sixth sense,” or gut feel.

Thinking vs. Feeling. This criterion represents how a person processes information. The former relies on logic while the latter is based on emotion (such as what a person feels he or she should do).

Image source: endofthegame.com

Judging vs. Perceiving. This reflects how a person implements the information he or she has processed. Judging requires an approach that is structured in nature, encouraging people to create strategic plans to achieve their goals. Perceiving, by contrast, has no limitations and recommends people to keep their choices open.

Paul Gabrinetti, Ph.D., is a Jungian analyst and clinical psychologist on the faculty in the Analyst Training Program at C.G. Jung Institute of Los Angeles. For more on his professional background, click here.


Published by


Paul Gabrinetti, Ph.D., is a core faculty professor in Clinical Psychology at the Pacifica Graduate Institute in Carpinteria, California. With four decades of professional experience, he has been on various teaching or consultancy roles from a number of prestigious institutions, including the University of Southern California, Antioch University, Pepperdine University, Woodland Hills Psychiatric Medical Group, Wesval Counseling Center, and The Institute for Human Studies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s